The Cockney Bard & the Secret!

The Poetical & Philosophical work from me in the main comes via voices in the head and my pen brings them to life. It has done so for over twenty years. The work has many aspects from nature to the mind. The work is/was written at great speed. Almost all the pieces from start to finish were composed in a minute or two. If I didn’t write them i would find it hard to believe myself, but they are there for all to see. They originally came with no grammar or punctuation. I make no claim to their quality, only that they are many styles, personalities & subjects.  I have written much conversational text in the same way from various sources over the years, with many revealing unknown things & future insight including my own wedding, which indeed came to pass. What is the extraneous source which feeds me with intelligence? And fed Keats, Shelley, Blake, Brooke, Plato, Socrates, Shakespeare, Yeats, Sir Francis Bacon, Marlowe, Da Vinci, Dr John Dee & many other great & good, famous & non-famous people both men & women. Poets, artists, musicians & philosophers. It is the true secret now revealed.

Points I would like to make. 1) The voices in the head have given me philosophy, poetry, insight & accurate future prediction. This rules out mental illness. 2) My mind does not have rambling thoughts, but is in what can only be described as a permanent state of meditation, which enables me to be able to write at will this form of communication. A 24 hour a day communication if so desired (see picture 2). Simplest description of it? It is like being a secretary with a dictaphone. 3) Distinquishing between your own thought process & the extraneous source is extremely difficult. 4) The poetical & philosophical material comes when the muse is upon me and is not something produced at will, whereas the communication is. I am an eternal river of thoughts. Can this be proven? For certain it can. I can produce without fail. Hundreds of words from thin air, at speed, in the form of communication. 5)  A comparison between a piece I have just written and a poetical, philosophical or communicative piece from 20 years ago will be comparable to the eye. Proving it is from the same pen (person), speed etc. However an expert on style and personality will find a discernible difference, not only between the pieces, but from my own personal style and personality. Even if you are not an expert, it is impossible to accept that all the writings have come from one person, one pen, one mind.

http://www.thecockneybard.com http://www.thecockneybardphilosophia.com,  thecockneybard.wordpress.com Some original writings from hundreds produced 1,2,7,8,9 are clearly examples of a communication. Click on them to view & zoom in. The others are differing styles & personalities of poetical work. Written by one hand (mine), at speed with no pause, punctuation or grammar. One can clearly ascertain from them all that the writings are from the extraneous source.

 

940865_565995696765478_1554719420_n943058_565996130098768_1201459976_n 945381_565995390098842_1422710418_n578868_565995816765466_1233454299_n165294_565998383431876_1149620216_n(2)165231_565995893432125_1528401898_n945227_565997820098599_539489850_n945268_565998120098569_211784332_n935738_565998260098555_331120117_n944660_565995960098785_1268880954_n472987_565995146765533_451895998_o21329_565995230098858_1670014546_n

Post cards from the late international star Anthony Newley & well known International Magician & Debunker James Randi whose Million Dollars remained safe, after he decided I couldn’t be discredited as a fraud. He made the decision not to go on TV with me. He did however kindly reply to my offer of a challenge to him by saying I was ‘a deluded person’. It goes to show tangible evidence and the ability to demonstrate it at will is not something Randi wanted! For all his TV debunking of your Gellers and others the Cockney Bard is simply a bridge too far! No one has ever come forward to challenge what I have said who had any idea or worthwhile contribution of what it is, or even could be. Nor have they been prepared to go on Worldwide/National TV or Radio that includes the likes of Dr Chris French, Richard Wiseman, Derren Brown, Richard Dawkins et al.

I did however once meet Dr Peter Fenwick, FRCPsych.  Consultant Neuropsychiatrist and Neurophysiologist. BA, MB,BChir, DPM, FRCPsych. in London who described what I had as a ‘talent’ which i guess is as near as damn it to saying you’re not ‘mad’ but I don’t quite understand it. I am 20 years on since that very brief meet and have a vastly more educated understanding of it all. I wonder what would he make of it now? Some will say it is ‘Genius’ and they may well be right! Genius (n.) late 14c., “tutelary god (classical or pagan),” from Latin genius “guardian deity or spirit which watches over each person from birth; spirit, incarnation, wit, talent;” also “prophetic skill,” originally “generative power,” from root of gignere “beget, produce” CLUE: Sonnet 86 Shakespeare ‘He nor that affable familiar ghost which nightly gulls (feeds) him with intelligence’ The Ever Living Poet

See Conversing Spirits A Guide for Dummies http://t.co/a9WlNWzUci

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s